If an individual or business violates a contract, the other party is entitled to mutual legal assistance (or a “cure”) under the law. The main corrective action to be taken in the event of an infringement is the most important: most contracts expire when both parties have fulfilled their contractual obligations, but it is not uncommon for a party to fail to fully fulfill its contract. Breach of contract is the most common reason why contractual disputes are to be resolved. If a breach of contract occurs or is alleged, one or both parties may wish the contract to be applied to its terms, or they may attempt to assert financial harm caused by the alleged breach. There are three main routes for which a party can be held responsible for the offence. This includes the timing: if you have been named in a breach claim or if you believe that another party has not fulfilled its contractual obligations to your company, there may be issues at stake. Before deciding how to pursue your business litigation, it is advisable to consult an experienced small business lawyer in your area first to discuss your options. Your business lawyer can advise you on the pros and cons of filing a default claim and balance other options. In order to terminate a contract for violation of the opposition, the innocent party must inform the defensian party. Many trade agreements contain clauses that define a procedure in which termination must be carried out and in what form. Therefore, in the case of a written contract, it is necessary to ensure that the terms of the contract are verified and that compliance is guaranteed, regardless of whether the other party may have, on its face, committed a clear and negative offence. It is only when the defensian party is informed that a breach of refusal has been “accepted” that the contract is terminated. If the defaulting party is not informed that the refusal has been accepted, the contract will remain in effect.
An innocent party is not obliged to exercise its right to terminate and to accept a violation of the refusal. If they do not, the treaty will remain in force.  These classifications merely describe how a contract can be breached, not the seriousness of the offence. A judge will decide, on the basis of the claims of both parties, whether a contract has been breached or not.  For example, A contracts with B on January 1 to sell 500 quintals of wheat and deliver it on May 1. On April 15, A wrote to B to say that he would not deliver the wheat. B may immediately consider the violation to have occurred and sue for damages for the proposed benefit, although A has until May 1 to do so. However, a unique feature of the anticipated breach is that if an aggrieved party decides not to accept a refusal that occurs before the time allotted for execution, not only will the contract continue on foot, but there will also be no right to compensation, unless an actual violation occurs.
 An anticipated offence is an offence in which the applicant suspects that the defaulting party can break a contract by doing or not doing something that demonstrates its intention to fail to meet its obligations.